Contact Us

Contact us with your needs






Your Message

Key Concepts

Login Form



Defense in Laos plot gains key evidence

The quality of federal prosecutors' evidence against 12 men accused of plotting the violent overthrow of the communist regime in Laos is headed for its biggest test yet.

With the case well over 3 years old and no trial date set, U.S. District Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. has set an evidentiary hearing in Sacramento on four defense motions that allege the case is built on lies and omissions by an undercover agent of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to obtain wiretaps and search warrants.

How Damrell decides those motions could make or break the case.

While the defense has a very high – perhaps insurmountable – standard it must meet, the hearing is not good news for the prosecution. It is convened under authority granted to a federal trial judge by a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court opinion, Franks v. Delaware.

The defense argues the government did not meet the statutory requirements for wiretaps on the phones of Harrison Jack, a retired Army lieutenant colonel from Woodland, and Hmong American Lo Cha Thao, regarded as a shameless self-promoter in his ethnic community. They are arguably the defendants at the greatest risk of conviction.

Franks v. Delaware created a route to invalidate court orders for wiretaps if the supporting agent affidavits "conceal or misrepresent material facts leading a judge inappropriately to find necessity for a wiretap order."

Applicable appellate case law requires a "substantial showing" by the defense that affidavits are reckless or have intentional misrepresentations or omissions and, therefore, the affidavits would not support wiretaps. Once those two prongs are met, defendants are entitled to test the validity of the evidence through live testimony and cross-examination of witnesses.

The prosecution, led by Assistant U.S. Attorney S. Robert Tice-Raskin, argued there are "no cognizable misstatements or omissions in the affidavits. The Supreme Court has made it plain that a substantial preliminary showing means far more than just conclusory allegations."

The hearing, scheduled for the last week in February and the first week in March, will also address a renewed defense motion to dismiss the indictment because of "outrageous government conduct." The defense contends it will be entitled to question, among others:

• The firearms agent who went undercover as a black market weapons peddler eager to sell his wares to the alleged conspirators.

Defense lawyers claim the evidence clearly shows the agent was the main instigator of the plot. Prosecutors counter that all the agent did was make his impressive array of weapons available to a group ready, willing and able to supply mercenaries and arm insurgents in Laos.

• Assistant U.S. Attorney Ellen Endrizzi, who had a hand in supervising the agent and who oversaw the wiretap and search warrant processes. She is in Baghdad on special assignment but was served by the defense with a subpoena before leaving.

• FBI Special Agent Nasson Walker, the sole grand jury witness used by prosecutors to secure the indictment. The defense contends Walker, a terrorism expert, was asked hundreds of leading questions that he answered without any real firsthand knowledge.

• Assistant U.S. Attorney Jill Thomas, the prosecutor who questioned Walker.

Eleven of the defendants are Hmong Americans who don't deny they, like most of the approximately 250,000 members of their community, are bothered by alleged brutal treatment of Hmong in Laos at the hands of the government and the United States' refusal to intervene. But they flatly reject the notion they – along with Jack – were mapping an armed insurrection.

Initially, the most prominent defendant was Maj. Gen. Vang Pao, who led a CIA-directed guerrilla force of Hmong and other indigenous hill people which fought alongside the American military between 1961 and 1975 against the communists in Southeast Asia. But the government dropped its charges against him last year.

Now, it is poised to defer prosecution and eventually drop the charges against Youa True Vang, who served as a colonel in Vang Pao's army.

By dropping these charges, prosecutors rid themselves of two big San Francisco law firms capable of bringing to bear resources equal to the government's. Vang Pao was represented by John Keker, head of a sizable firm. Youa True Vang is represented by James Brosnahan, a senior partner at Morrison and Foerster, one of California's largest firms.

Youa True Vang has pending a prickly motion to dismiss the charges against him due to prosecutorial misconduct before the grand jury, which Brosnahan will withdraw as part of the deal.

Keker and Brosnahan are legendary figures, known for their take-no-prisoners advocacy.

With them gone, that leaves the Office of the Federal Defender with the most resources on the defense side, but those are insignificant compared with the private firms. Federal Defender Daniel Broderick, aggressive in his own right, and two of his assistants, Jeff Staniels and Benjamin Galloway, represent Jack.

Most of the others are sole practitioners, some of them top-tier criminal defense attorneys, but they can only do so much by themselves.



Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2010/09/08/3012071/sacramento-defense-in-alleged.html#ixzz0yxDLp8Mv
 
Sex life of murder suspect's wife will be aired at Vue trial

Chu VueThe Sacramento Bee  September 3, 2010

By Andy Furillo, The Sacramento Bee, Calif.

Sept. 03--The Chu Vue murder trial figures to take a wild spin next week with testimony focused on the extramarital sex life of the former Sacramento sheriff deputy's wife.

Defense attorney Donald Masuda had the judge order four correctional employees at the California Medical Facility back to court when the trial resumes Tuesday, when he will seek to question them about their relationships with his client's wife, Chia Vue.

Prosecutors say Chu Vue arranged the shooting death of another facility employee, Steve Lo, nearly two years ago because the officer was having an affair with his wife, who also worked at the Vacaville prison.

Masuda said in court Thursday that Chia Vue's other purported love interests would show that she was having affairs with so many men that it wouldn't make sense for his client to target only Steve Lo.

"It's our opinion that he was a chump just like Mr. Vue was a chump," Masuda said. The lawyer said his client realized "this is the way she's always going to be," and that he had "moved on" from his marriage.

Besides wanting to show that Chu Vue didn't have reason to direct his anger at just one person, Masuda said he needs to elicit testimony about his wife's continuing affairs to undercut what he called the "lovey dovey" jail letters between Chia and Chu Vue that he fears the prosecution will introduce.

Such correspondence could show a continued passion between the two, bolstering the motive to kill laid out by prosecutors, Masuda suggested.

The sex testimony, Masuda said, will demonstrate that Chia Vue "is a deceitful person." The trial judge, however, said that fact is already so well established that any more testimony on the subject would be "like carrying coal to Newcastle."

"I don't think you're going to have a high hill to climb to show Mrs. Vue -- is not a paragon of virtue," Sacramento Superior Court Judge Steve White said.

Deputy District Attorney Eric Kindall said Masuda's witness lineup for Tuesday threatens to turn the trial into "a circus."

"We should not be having a parade of people going through this courtroom saying, 'I slept with her. No, I didn't,' " he said.

Kindall argued that before any of the men takes the stand, the defense first must establish their relevance to Chu Vue's mind-set. Kindall said such a predicate can only be nailed down through the testimony of Chu Vue himself -- or his wife.

Masuda said he plans to call his client to testify.

Chia Vue, meanwhile, doesn't want to take the stand. She appeared in court Thursday with a lawyer who filed a motion to block her testimony on grounds of marital privilege.

Her attorney, Gregory Foster, also sought to quash Masuda's subpoena for fear that Chia Vue might incriminate herself if the questioning leads to what she knew about the harboring of the alleged gunmen in the case, Chu Vue's younger brothers, Gary Vue, 29, and Chong Vue, 31. Kindall said he is prepared to offer immunity.

White, in a tentative ruling from the bench, denied Chia Vue's motion.

Court records show she filed a divorce petition against her husband earlier this year.

Chu Vue, 45, is on trial along with co-defendant Lang Vue, 27, in the shooting death of the 39-year-old correctional officer in the garage of his south Sacramento home.

Lang Vue is accused of aiding and abetting the killing by obtaining motel rooms and rental cars, and then buying a car for the alleged gunmen.

On Thursday, the prosecutor cross-examined Lang Vue about the younger Vue brothers using his house as a base of operations for the Lo killing on Oct. 15, 2008.

The co-defendant had testified under direct questioning that he thought Gary and Chong Vue, who were wanted at the time for a murder in Minneapolis, dropped into Sacramento to pay respects to their ill parents before heading back to Minnesota to surrender.

Kindall noted in his questioning that a cell phone linked to Gary and Chong Vue pinged off a tower near Lang Vue's house at 4:33 a.m. the day of the shooting, just 13 minutes before a car believed to be theirs was caught on a surveillance video driving down the street where Steve Lo lived.

At 4:58 a.m., Lo's wife called 911 to report that her husband had been shot.

"Isn't it true, sir, that they were using your home as a base from which to go out and kill Steve Lo?" Kindall asked.

"Probably," Lang Vue replied. "I would guess so."

At 5:33 a.m., the alleged gunmen's cell phone once again pinged off the tower closest to Lang Vue's house.

"Is it true," Kindall asked, "that Gary Vue was back at your house making calls right after the murder?"

"I was sleeping," Lang Vue replied.

Vue had testified earlier that he gave Gary Vue a key to his house and that he didn't know the precise movements of the suspected shooter around the time of the Lo killing. He insisted during his two days on the witness stand that he did not know that the younger Vue brothers intended to kill Lo.

 
2 local men presumedly die in ocean

Traci Kratzer
Record Gazette Staff Writer

Two Banning residents are presumed to have drowned after getting caught in a rip current last weekend (August 28, 2010) in Huntington Beach.

John Shua Lee, 24, and Shao Moua, 20, got caught, along with two others, in a rip current just before 4:40 p.m. on Aug. 28, according to officials.

Lee, Moua and two other men, who were in town with their youth group to celebrate a wedding, waded about 20 to 30 yards from shore and got sucked into a strong rip current, officials said. The youth group is a part of the Laotian Evangelical Church, a Hmong Christian Church, in Banning, according to Moua’s sister, Shoua.

 
Air Force hero's actions in Laos finally recognized after 42 years

Richard Etchberger

By Larry Shaughnessy, CNN Pentagon Producer
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • NEW: The United States did not want to admit it had troops in nominally neutral Laos
  • Chief Master Sgt. Richard Etchberger's heroism was hidden for years
  • He died after saving three comrades in Laos

Washington (CNN) -- President Obama will award the Medal of Honor, the military's highest award for bravery, to Air Force Chief Master Sgt. Richard Etchberger for his valor in saving the lives of three wounded comrades at a then-secret base in Laos in 1968, the White House announced Friday.

After Etchberger saved his fellow airmen, he was shot and killed by enemy fighters.

His heroics were kept a secret for years because the United States wasn't supposed to have troops in Laos during the Vietnam War. President Lyndon Johnson rejected a nomination for Etchberger to receive the Medal of Honor at the time because of the political trouble it could have stirred up.

Etchberger was part of a secret U.S. Air Force radar base in northern Laos, just 120 miles from Hanoi in North Vietnam. The base's purpose was to guide U.S. bomber crews on their missions over North Vietnam and parts of Laos that were under communist control.

Laos was officially neutral during the war, but its leaders were upset that North Vietnamese troops and Viet Cong guerrillas were moving through Laos to attack U.S. troops in South Vietnam. So the Lao government allowed construction of the U.S. radar site provided it was kept secret, according to Tom Keany, an Air Force B-52 squadron commander during the Vietnam War and currently a military historian with the School for Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University.

In March of 1968 North Vietnamese troops attacked the site, called Lima Site 85, with a force of 3,000 soldiers against fewer than a couple dozen U.S. airmen and about a thousand Laotian soldiers.

Eventually, American helicopters were sent in to evacuate the Air Force personnel, but by then eight Americans had been killed and several more wounded. It is considered by some the deadliest ground attack against Air Force troops in the entire Vietnam era.

According the White House, Etchberger deliberately exposed himself to enemy fire "in order to place his three surviving wounded comrades in the rescue slings permitting them to be airlifted to safety."

It took an act of Congress in 2008 for Etchberger to be reconsidered for a Medal of Honor so long after the war had ended. In most cases, the medal recommendation must be made within two years of the act of heroism for which it is to be awarded.

Rep. Earl Pomeroy of North Dakota helped push for the reconsideration. Etchberger was a native of Bismarck, North Dakota.

"Chief Etchberger was denied the Medal of Honor because he was serving his country on the wrong side of a geographic barrier," Pomeroy said in written statement. "Heroism knows no boundary. While it's regrettable that this medal is coming forty years after Mr. Etchberger's death, I am honored to be part of the effort that recognized this true hero."

The ceremony for Etchberger, which will include his three sons, is scheduled for September 21 at the White House.

 
Hmong TV expanding reach from Web to KJEO

hmong tv
Posted at 05:13 PM on Wednesday, Sep. 01, 2010

The Fresno-based Hmong TV Network, which has only been available online at hmongtvnetwork.com since its launch 14 months ago, has found a home on local television. It's now airing on KJEO (Channel 32.6), a channel that's part of Cocola Broadcasting.

Merced's Chee Lee, president of the Hmong TV Network, says the channel is aimed at the more than 30,000 Hmong who live in the Fresno area.

"There are a lot of Hmong people who live here, and they have had no outlet. That is what we want to provide through education and information programs," Lee says.

The channel airs 24 hours a day, seven days a week. There are eight hours of original programming produced each weekday that are then rebroadcast twice more during the day. The most popular program is "Hmong TV News Live," which airs at 8 p.m. and covers both local and national stories.

Live talk shows fill the weekend schedule.

About 40% of the programming is produced at the station's downtown office. The remainder -- movies, documentaries and cultural programming -- come from Southeast Asia.

If the channel does well, Lee wants to expand to Minnesota and Wisconsin where there are also large Hmong populations.

Gary Cocola says the Armenian TV Network that had been airing on KJEO will move. No decision has been made as to the new channel location.

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 9